Regarding Frozen, Disney, and Computer Animation.

jhenne-bean:

haildisney:

So basically I just wanted to talk about how people are complaining about Disney. About their title changes, character designs, and more specifically, about Frozen. All Disney is getting is complaints about how bad Anna looks, how bad the story is, how bad the title is, and this negativity is really pissing me off! Why can’t y’all just wait until the final product? Wait and see if it is good or not. Sure Disney is a little behind, and sure Anna looks sort of like Rapunzel but so what? Did it bother you when Aroura sort of looked like Cinderella? When Rapunzel sort of looked like Ariel? And the title change, who cares!? It is just a title! The title doesn’t make a movie bad or good, what makes it good are the characters and the story! And that brings me to my other point, people are complaining that this story is stupid, or that it isn’t anything like the original. It really bothers me, because this isn’t the 90’s! Some stories have to be changed to fit with todays audiences! It is sad that we have to add in a male protagonist to increase the movies income, but that is how it is! And also, maybe Disney wants to tell a new story! The Princess and the Frog, Tangled , Wreck-It Ralph and Frozen are all new! They aren’t all original but they have new plots and such. Disney is being more creative than they were, and you have to give them props for that! They are thinking outside the box, new characters, and stories. So please stop complaining! I understand that you want the 90’s films back, but these aren’t 90’s films, they are a different time era, a different audience. The 90’s films weren’t the 50’s films either, and they were still good! They had a new formula each time, a new type of layout that worked! We are in the Disney CGI renaissance right now, better known (or rumored) as the Disney Revival. The Disney Golden Era, Renaissance, and Revival, have each had different formulas, and characters. Some where similar, but yet they are still amazing! So deal with it, that it’s not 1990, and leave the past behind! Look ahead to the future!

I get both the impression that you genuinely wanted to know why people are upset, and that you haven’t read literally any of the critiques and were just looking to vent. But since you tagged this right up, I’ll help you out and break it down. Starting with your closing line, because it realllly stands out.

leave the past behind! Look ahead to the future!

I’m not sure where you pulled the angry nostalgic 90’s kid strawman from, but either way, this line? This line right here?

image

It’s pretty funny, because as it turns out, that looking to the future is what a lot of critics are doing! That’s where a good chunk of disappointment comes from! I am boggled by your angle, really. You’re looking at this from a weird battle of the decades psuedo animation history perspective, and that might be why you’re missing what a lot of critics/unhappy fans are talking about.

You’re a Disney enthusiast, so I assume you know that Anna is their last listed “Upcoming Princess” to date, and their list of future films doesn’t indicate any Princess stories on the horizon, let alone any starring WoC.

Pixar’s upcoming films are: the Monster’s Inc. sequel, Good Dinosaur, the Finding Nemo Sequel, and an untitled Dia de los Muertos movie. Seeing as how Pixar could barely handle Merida without title, story, writer, and advertising angle being drastically altered —and since it takes Pixar about four to seven years to finish a film, and Disney studios about four to five years (Tangled was made in two, after 10,000 years of development hell)— I doubt we’re getting a PoC princess anytime soon. 

This, in combination with their history (~*the past*~) is the problem!

Disney has been making princess movies since 1937, and they didn’t have a princess of color until 1992. They wedged Pocohontas and Mulan in there to placate, and even then, their “Princess” status is  h u g e l y contested within the Disney fandom, and they usually aren’t included in most Disney Princess lineup gear. And when they are, you can bet they’re usually in the back. Seriously, most of the time they’re waaaay back there. Really now, Disney almost literally releases buffer walls of four White princesses in between what I have come to call their PoC Princess dumps. 

That is why a lot of people are upset!

Sure Disney is a little behind, and sure Anna looks sort of like Rapunzel but so what? Did it bother you when Aroura sort of looked like Cinderella? When Rapunzel sort of looked like Ariel?

Yes! Absolutely!

Because they are all W h i t e. Frozen easily could have been based in a PoC culture. Disney is no stranger to changing up their source material. So no, the main squibble here isn’t “OMG LOOK HOW SIMILAR THEIR EYEBROWS AND BUTTON NOSES ARE, YOU ARE SO FUCKING LAZY DISNEY” it’s the fact that Disney keeps cranking out White Princesses

It’s the fact that, to quote Moniquill:

“Ok we’ve been to ‘Total Fantasy World Inspired by Medieval Germany’ ‘Set in Mystical Medieval Scottland’ and now ‘Anderson’s Scandinavia’. They’re just going to the whitest places on earth on purpose now. It’s like a scavenger hunt for places that they can have plausible deniability for not including POC even as background characters.”

This is why the concept of comparing Anna and Rapunzel completely misses the point, as does your above “Why are you guys so mad!!” post. 

image

This?

image

These?

image

No. No one was saying that their chins were too similar. 

((Here. Another example: At best, I think it’s safe to assume that we won’t get another Black princess for at least fifteen years. I’ll have children by then! Just in time to tell them “Well, hold on to this Princess. Treasure her, even if you don’t relate to her, because that’s the only one you’re get.” All while the endless flood of White princesses with brunette hair or blonde hair and different eyebrows and button noses vs. slightly less button noses roll out, with the occasional PoC princess flung in to shake things up -or, more realistically, aim to appease critics of their white-girl formula, while the majority of the Disney fandom sits back like “WOW. A blonde princess with green eyes! How progressive!!” That’s not cool, and it is excluding a lot of little girls of color from having media representation!))

That’s why initiatives like the Princess Reina project, Racebent Disney, and even This Could Have Been Frozen are so popular; because PoCs get suuuuuuch limited representation when it comes to Disney, the Disney Princesses, and the media at large.

Disney isn’t exactly being clever with the same old heroine

And hey, remember the last time they made a Latina princess? Oh wait, they actually didn’t! LOL. 

And the title change, who cares!? It is just a title! The title doesn’t make a movie bad or good, what makes it good are the characters and the story! 

If you think the title of a film has no bearing on the film itself, proceed directly to Film 101. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. 

The fact that Disney’s new marketing angle is to reduce their princess story titles to single genderless adjectives because EWW GIRLY THINGS!!1! is deeply problematic. Like, you literally said “It is sad that we have to add in a male protagonist to increase the movies income, but that is how it is!” right after alleging that the changed titles don’t matter. Do you really not see the connection, here? (Here is the connection, in case you really don’t. Here are more thoughts about the changes to the story: Gerda as a girl vs. Anna as a Princess, Kai vs. Kristoff, the absence of little their girl and the addition of Elsa, and why it’s not exactly progress.)

They are thinking outside the box, new characters, and stories. So please stop complaining! I understand that you want the 90’s films back, but these aren’t 90’s films, they are a different time era, a different audience. 

What even is this part?

Firstly, Wreck-It-Ralph is not a Disney princess movie. So I’m not sure why you included it in this discourse? 

Secondly, are they really thinking outside the box?

Really?

image

Because they sure as hell aren’t being very diverse. In fact, their releases post-PatF are looking very 50’s, chromatically speaking. 

Why can’t y’all just wait until the final product? 

So, if you’ve come to understand even a fraction of why people are upset re: Frozen, you now know that waiting until the final product is released doesn’t address the critique at all! 

Why it’s problematic that Disney keeps on cranking white princesses:

disneyforprincesses:

Look around your neighborhood, look around your classroom, look at your friends. We are all culturally diverse. We are not all white! White should not be the norm. When we think about princesses we should not think about a white european princess automatically. There are African Princesses, Asian Princesses, Hispanic Princess, Indian Princesses,etc. There are so many princesses to pick from!

That’s why I’m so conflicted on Disney’s Snow Queen/Frozen. I love the story and I love Hans Christian Andersen, BUT WHY ANOTHER WHY WHITE PRINCESS/ WHITE CHARACTERS? I can almost sadly garantee you won’t see any POC in that film.

Moreover if you’re argument is that “Oh IT’S EUROPEAN STORIES SO THEY HAVE TO HAVE WHITE PEOPLE!” I’m sorry to break it to you but:

  • NOT ALL EUROPEAN PEOPLE ARE WHITE.
  • EUROPE DOES NOT EQUAL ALL WHITE.

Also if you’re argument is that “OH well THOSE ARE REALLY GOOD FAIRYTALES/STORIES THAT’S WHY DISNEY PICKS THEM” Again I hate to break your heart but:

  • Have you read Mexican fairytales? African American Folklore? Asian stories? Every single countries has a diverse set of tales that could be amazing turned into wonderful Disney films. Also imagine the scenery and breathtaking animation? To draw an African Savannah? The shores of any Pacific Island? The Great pyramids of Aztecs/Mayans?
  • Do you know how amazing it would be?

I am Hispanic. I have never seen a Princess who looks like me. I have a 8 year old sister. She’s dark skinned and her favorite princess is usually Ariel or Tiana. Ariel because of the fact she’s mermaid, Tiana because she loves her dress and she identifies with her, she sees Tiana as closely resembling her. I want her to keep having more Tianas, in a sense more princesses she identifies with. More princesses all my siblings and cousins can identify with.

Yes I grew up with a world with white princesses and I love many of them. I absolutely love Aurora for the sake of the Sleeping Beauty. I learned to identify with them. When Tiana came out it was a big deal to me, because Tiana is the only princess I personally connect with. I share a similar personality to Tiana but I’m not saying The Princess and the Frog was perfect. No, infact it shows the most blatant racism. The princess (Tiana) in the story spends most of the film as frog. Never in the history of the Disney have they have princess spend her entire film as an animal or non human form. Disney was still shaking in their whitecentric boots that they fear having a black princess for too long in a movie might not work. Whatever argument you might want to contradict or argue in favor of Disney’s choice is invalid.

Now Disney, you come here cranking up stories and more princesses and still exposing the same white characters. I’m fed up. I want another Asian princess, give me a Japanese Empress, an Pacific Islander Princess, a African-American warrior princess, give me an Indian Princess, give me a freaking Hispanic Princess. 

Pocahontas,Jasmine,Mulan and Tiana can only do so much versus the white empire of characters and princesses you have created.

That freakin’ snail, man…Just from season 1…

I’m Just Your Problem - Rebecca Sugar* (Adventure Time)

Em, Bm, C, G
Ladadadada, I’m going to bury you in the ground,
Em, Bm, C, G
Ladadadada, I’m going to bury you with my sound.
Em, Bm, C, G
I’m going to drink the red from your pretty pink face,
Em, Bm, C, G
I’m going to— (Marceline, that’s too distasteful!) (Oh, you don’t like that? Or do you
just not like me?!)

Em, Bm, C, G
Sorry I don’t treat you like a goddess,
Is that what you want me to do?

Em, Bm, C, G
Sorry I don’t treat you like you’re perfect,
Like all your little loyal subjects do

Em, B7, C, G
Sorry I’m not made of sugar,
Am I not sweet enough for you?

Em, Bm, C, G,
Is that why you always avoid me?
That must be such an inconvenience to you

C7, B7, Em, Cmaj7
Well, I’m just your problem
I’m just your problem

C7, B7, Em, Cmaj7
It’s like I’m not even a person, am I?
I’m just your problem

Em, Bm, C, G
Well, I shouldn’t have to justify what I do
Em, Bm, C, G
I shouldn’t have to prove anything to you
Em, Bm, C, G
I’m sorry that I exist, I forget what landed me on your black list
Em, Bm, C, G
But I shouldn’t have to be the one that makes up with you

C7, B7, Em, Cmaj7
So, why do I want to? Why do I want to…?

Em, Bm, C, G
To bury you in the ground… and drink the blood… from your… ugh!

rebeccasugar:

The demo for the finale song in “What Was Missing,” “My Best Friends in the World!”

I’m really honored when people call me a songwriter. I wanted to earn that title with the songs I wrote for this episode. Here are the chords-

A7, Dm, A7, Dm

A7, Dm, A7, Dm

Bb, F, A7, Dm,

This- this is what was missing! The truth!

Bb, F, Bb, F, 

Bb, F, Bb, F, Bb, F, Bb, F, A7,

Bb, F, C, Bb, 

Bb, F, C, Bb, 

Bb, F, C, Bb,

F…. A7…

(Repeat)

…G… (shifts up…)

C, G, D, C,

C, G, D, C,

C, G, D, C,

G…. B7…

Em, C, G, B7,

Em (doooooor break!)

MOAR, YES, MAKE MY FINGERS BLEED

back to top
©